Trades Intelligence

You do not buy a player in a trade. You take on his contract and send capital the other way.

A trade is not a purchase for a fee, it is an exchange of contracts and capital under the cap. A team that trades for a player inherits his existing contract, and the currency it sends is cap space and draft capital, not cash. Trading a player away relieves a team of his future salary but not of the dead money it keeps, so the real cost of a trade is on both sides of the ledger. And the draft capital that moves is priced two ways, the market chart teams trade against and the surplus chart a disciplined team builds on, and the gap between them is the edge.

Case 01 · the contract is the asset, not the player

You inherit the deal. Cap space and capital go the other way.

A player is not bought and sold for a fee. A team that trades for a player inherits his existing contract, his base salaries, his future obligations, his guarantees, and his cap hits across the remaining years, and the currency of the trade is cap space and draft capital.

You get a contract
The player and his cap hits, guarantees, years
The acquiring team inherits the existing deal and its future dead-money risk, not a clean slate.
You send capital
Cap space and picks, current or future
The currency of the trade is capital, cleared against the cap, never cash for the player.
No cash for the playerThe trade clears against the cap, not a bank balance. The value the acquiring team evaluates is the contract it takes on (its cap hit, its guarantees, its surplus) against the capital it sends.

The same player is a different trade to two teams: a contender with cap room inheriting a cost-controlled deal is capturing surplus, a capped-out team inheriting a top-of-market deal is buying negative surplus at a capital cost. The player's on-field value is one input, but the object is the contract. Trade the contract, price it under the cap, and send capital, not cash.

Illustrative on the real contract-as-asset rule (the acquiring team inheriting the contract and guarantees, the currency as cap and capital not cash, the trade cleared against the cap, the contract priced into each team's cap position). Composite trade, demonstration figures.

Case 02 · the dead money you keep is the real cost

The player leaves. The accelerated bonus does not.

Trading a player away does not clear his contract off the books. The trading team is relieved of his future base salary and roster bonuses, but it keeps the remaining prorated signing and option bonus, which accelerates onto its cap as dead money. The accelerated proration cannot be sent away with the player.

Relieved of
The cap relief that motivates the trade
The future base salary and roster bonuses leave with the player.
Keeps
The accelerated bonus that cannot be sent away
The remaining prorated signing and option bonus accelerates onto the cap as dead money, plus any guaranteed base salary.
The real costSo the real cost of trading a player away is the dead money the trade leaves behind, and a heavily-bonused contract is expensive to move: the more a team pushed into bonus proration and void years, the larger the dead-money bill when the player leaves early. The engine computes the dead money of a trade at any point in the contract, so a team sees the true cost of the move before it makes it.
Pre-June-1 trade
All remaining proration accelerates onto the current year in one hit.
Post-June-1 designation
The hit splits over two seasons, this year's proration now and the rest next year.

This is the same limited-guarantee, bonus-heavy structure read from the trading side. A trade that looks like clean cap relief can carry a bill that eats most of the savings, and the engine will not let the salary relieved stand in for the net cap effect. Price both sides of the ledger, the money shed and the money kept.

Illustrative on the real trade-side dead-money layer (the salary relieved versus the accelerated bonus kept, the dead-money cost of moving a heavily-bonused contract, the pre- and post-June-1 treatments). Composite trade, treatment current-as-of.

Case 03 · draft capital, two charts, and the gap

The market chart is steep. The surplus chart is flat. Trade the difference.

Draft picks are the currency of a trade, and the engine values them two ways and keeps them distinct: the traditional trade-market value teams actually trade against, steep and top-heavy, and the analytical surplus value a disciplined team builds on, far flatter and peaking in the mid-first-to-second round.

Trade-market valueAnalytical surplus
Top of round 1
100
58
Late round 1
52
74
Round 2
34
70
Round 4
12
40
The mispricing surfaceThe trade-market chart overvalues the top of the first round relative to the surplus it returns, because the top pick's slotted rookie cost climbs faster than the expected on-field value does. The gap between the two charts is a mispricing surface, and the engine names when a team is paying the market premium versus capturing the surplus.
The favored moveThe analytically favored move is trading down the steep part of the market chart to accumulate flatter-but-cheaper surplus. Future picks are discounted for time and for the uncertainty of where they land, and the engine integrates the full draft-capital stock, current and future, as a multi-year spendable resource.

The engine must still clear a trade against the market chart, because that is the price the other team trades at, but it reports the surplus chart alongside it. Trading down is not always right, a specific player worth the premium changes the math, but the default mispricing runs one direction, and the engine names it every time. Clear the trade at the market, but build on the surplus.

Illustrative on the real draft-capital layer (the steep trade-market chart against the flatter surplus chart, the mispricing at the top of the first round, the trade-down-for-surplus move, the future-pick discount and multi-year stock). Composite picks and charts, held in the Pro Cap Reference.

The law underneath
A trade is not a purchase. It is an exchange of contracts and capital under the cap.

The whole trade engine follows from refusing the one intuitive error, that a team buys a player for a fee. It does not. A team that trades for a player inherits his contract, his base salaries, his guarantees, and his cap hits, and it sends cap space and draft capital the other way, so the object of a trade is a contract and the currency is capital, cleared against the cap and never against a bank balance. That reframing changes both sides of the ledger. On the acquiring side, the value is the contract taken on, cheap for a good player is surplus captured, expensive for the same player is negative surplus bought at a capital cost, and the same player is a different trade to a team with room than to a team without it. On the trading side, moving a player relieves the future salary but keeps the accelerated bonus proration as dead money that cannot be sent away, so the real cost of a trade is the money kept as much as the money shed, and a heavily-bonused contract is expensive to escape. And the capital itself is mispriced by the market, the steep trade-market chart overvalues the top of the first round relative to the flat surplus a pick actually returns, so the engine clears the trade at the market and builds on the surplus. Price the contract, count the dead money, and trade the capital against the surplus, not the fee.

Trade the contract, not the player. Price both sides of the ledger.

Trades Intelligence models a trade as an exchange of contracts and capital under the cap, prices the inherited contract into each team's cap position, computes the dead money the trading team keeps, and values the draft capital against the surplus chart, not just the market chart.

Get access